The observer, the thinker, the experimenter and the connoisseur is the same. When we look at a rose our knowledge stays half if we forget the connoisseur. Therefore when we look at a rose need to look in three directions, namely what is known – the rose – the connoisseur – your – and the relationship that exists between the two – the knowledge. We always have to be aware of ourselves, the connoisseur, the thinker, the experimenter. Now are reading this and tea they will of the Knower, thinker, forgetting all your attention is focused on reading and you forget you’re reading and more importantly which reads that what they read, which listens to the speaker. Which speaks can say very beautiful and interesting things may even seem real, but have absolutely no value because they are based on your knowledge, experiences, and this has nothing to do with you, one to have their own ideas, thoughts or experiences for this self-knowledge is necessary and to get to know oneself not need ideas, thoughts, knowledge and experiences – by very beautiful that they are – of others, because they can be true or false and are your experiences, their knowledge and not ours. When a conditioned thought appears as > ask yourself who that said you? You will see that the answers come from the mind of knowledge, memory.
Is you yourself who asks the question and gives the answer. It is your knowledge, your memory, what they learned from others through the different media which responds. The different responses that can give are not ours but we believe otherwise, only they are mere repetitions of that others have told us and we take as our.
This type of Conficker is, however, since April 1st daily 50,000 new domain names per day, of which 500 are selected randomly. The worm again seemed still active and dangerous than ever mid-important to lose. In the BitDefender E-threat-report of the month June, for example, he took only fifth in the threat-top 10 with 3.33 percent. In the current November report from BitDefender Downadup is however again for 5.62 percent of global infections responsible trend is rising. Thus he was ranked three under the E-threats at present. Only the two Trojan clicker (7.87) and AutorunINF (8.45) have a higher infection rate. The new recipe for success”: current variants restrict access to anti malware websites from IT-security providers and denied users run Windows updates.
In addition install faulty security software”. Kido in the year 2010 the purpose of the Conficker authors was always to build a global communications network, so that the worm automatically further spread and update that receives commands and Way countered the defense systems of as many PCs as possible. With this tactic, the worm remains a threat with a great exposure and high Wandlungsfahigkeit. This and the development described in the current E-threat report suggest that Conficker continues will be rocking the boat also in 2010. The increased rate of infections makes it clear that safety awareness among the users is still very low.
Many PC users don’t know also that effective removal tools available are (E.g. under), the Conficker on the system to identify and eliminate. BitDefender recommends that effective security solutions to protect PCs. The new 2010 BitDefender Antivirus, Internet security and total security suites a proactive protection against all malware. See a free speed test tells you whether Conficker is on the computer or not. About BitDefender BitDefender is software developer, one of the industry’s fastest and most efficient product lines internationally certified security software. Since the founding of the company in 2001, BitDefender has set new standards in the field of proactive protection against threats from the Internet. Every day, BitDefender protects tens of millions of private and business customers around the world and gives them the good feeling that your digital life is safe. BitDefender sells its security solutions in more than 100 countries through a global VAD and reseller network. More detailed information about BitDefender and BitDefender products are available in the press centre online. In addition, BitDefender provides background information and current news in the daily fight against threats from the Internet, in English at. Press contact: BitDefender GmbH Robert-Bosch-str. 2 D-59439 Holzwickede contact person: Hans-Peter Lange PR Manager Tel.
“Sustainable investments and environmental investments at the ‘Green money’ in Hamburg stable and sustainable investments with sense shows on 26 March the consumer fair ‘ green money” in the historic Hamburg curio-Haus in the Rothenbaumchaussee 11. The entrance to the Green money exhibition and the very extensive seminar programme is free! The Bonn ForestFinance, forest investment provider with over 3,500 hectares of market leader in the field of direct forest investments, provides extensive information on the fair through its sustainable forest investments. In addition to consulting at the booth, ForestFinance is the 10 most important points for forest investments at 14:20 on the subject”introduce themselves and also answers to audience questions. At the BaumSparVertrag of ForestFinance, for one year a total of 12 hardwood trees planted and maintained lasting until the harvest. “Predicts is an annual return of 6% to 9%, so that the BaumSparer” at the end of the term that gets six to eight times the deposit amount, see on much interest is certainly the 12:30 encounter held panel discussion “how quickly renewable energy substitutes for nuclear power?”. Wind power experts take part in the Panel discussion as well as a representative of the CDU faction. The venue of the Green money fair, the historical CURIO-Haus on the Rothenbaumchaussee 11 is accessible by public transportation via the train station Dammtor or the Stephansplatz of the U1 Metro station.
The Green money fair is an official action within the framework of the environmental capital”. Patron of the event is Prof. Dr. Maximilian Gege, Chairman of b.a.u.m. e.V.
of the largest largest environmental initiative of Europe’s economy. Investors and professionals can consult money through forest investments, solar – and wind bonds and funds, micro finance, environmental savings bonds, accounts, loans or sustainable pensions green. Green money Hamburg should show how much bandwidth sustainable investment now covers the topic. Return strong and stable value given of the world’s burgeoning debt offer real value forest Investments in the sustainable value of forest many advantages.
Party questioning an investor upon request of the defendant Bank of BGH had to deal with, whether an investor as a party in the process at the request of the defendant bank may be heard, i.e. he can be interviewed if necessary and under oath to the consultation or conclusion of investments currently with the question. Background is that a bank without asking to clarify according to settled case-law of the highest German civil court on received kickbacks. Otherwise she is damages. Refunds in particular commissions are, paid from fees and management fees which are not disclosed to the investor but. By not knowing the investor while no delusion with regard to the system can occur with this, but there is the possibility that misjudges how the interest on pages of the Bank is. The Bank, which does not comply with their duty of disclosure must thereby prove, that the damage at the investor would have occurred even if they are dutifully would behave, but the investors despite knowledge of the kickbacks would be; entered into the investment There is therefore a burden of proof.
When investors however draws a system despite an appropriate note, nothing more can be a breach of the duty of disclosure. In the case it was to first educating needy refunds. However, the Bank had argued that the enlightenment about a refund at the decision of the investor had played no role. Because it wanted to explicitly draw the proposed tax-optimized systems. Therefore it would have also if knowledge to a degree, so the Bank.
The Court of appeal left ignore the request of the Bank on party interrogation of the investor. The Supreme Court on the other hand makes it clear, however, is to consider that there is still sufficient link between the presentation of the Bank and the investors, and therefore the request for hearing of the investor. Because is the claim that even with the investor Note of the refund the system had acquired when it out, there is no causality between damage and the breach of duty (not information relating to a Commission). A further substantiation of evidence request is not required according to the BGH, what applies in particular not only for the witnesses, but also for the present party proof. However, it is to examine whether an abuse in the application of a party questioning is seen by the Court. This is however only then, if the application makes arbitrary “in into the blue”. Here, the Bank has put forward but concrete evidence of who speak in the total consideration for this. that the plaintiff also having regard to the refunds would have chosen the system. This includes the fact that it arrived the investors first and foremost on tax savings and only secondary yield opportunities have been taken into account. Were there to acquire the recommended product-related investments only with a similar refund could be assumed in this case that the decision was made independently of a refund by the claimant. The judgment of the Court of appeal was therefore repealed by the BGH and again remitted.